MONEY LAUNDERER by Kenneth Rijock
Not all of my cooperative work with law enforcement resulted in the arrest and conviction of the targets, generally because of mistakes made by the federal agents handling the matter. Some of those guys were guilty of the cardinal sin of arrogance, which can lead to overconfidence. When you think you know everything, you make mistakes. Understand that though these specific cases took place over the course of a decade or more, that most of the errors could have been prevented. The law enforcement culture of many agencies unfortunately perpetuates a conformist mindset that discourages original thinking and improvisation. Watch and learn how inflexibility can turn a certain win into a loss. Rather than soundly embarrass the agents involved, I have omitted the name of the agencies involved. Of course, if a reader really has to know, all you have to do is e-mail me for the name of the guilty one in any of these stories.
- A source of mine with years of successful work as a confidential informant, both in the US and elsewhere, was delivering valuable information to a federal agency about Russian organised crime drug activity on Miami Beach. He had a sub-source who was an Arabic-speaking Middle Eastern Jew who worked in a hotel in Hollywood, Florida, near Ft. Lauderdale. The sub-source overheard a group of individuals in the hotel bar, discussing how they were going to blow up the White House. When my source passed along this urgently, the agents threatened him, saying that his job was to bring in Russian organised crime intelligence, an not anything else. They also told him that even mentioning an attack on the White House could be construed as a crime, and they ordered him to keep quiet. The individuals the sub-source overheard were the 9/11 hijackers, having their farewell party just before traveling to the cities where they would board their respective fatal flights to infamy. The agents were never disciplined for their errors, and still are at work today.
- A friend and yours truly set out to locate and target hydroponic marijuana grow houses located in South Florida. The first one we identified and fingered was operated by the son of a law enforcement official, so the target never went to jail. The second house we identified was located behind another house. the law enforcement agency hit the wrong house, effectively spoiling any element of surprise we might have to search the real grow house at a later date. The target moved out immediately. The federal agent in charge did not appear to have any real experience in this field. A couple of years later, I offered to brief that agency on my extensive knowledge of the use of former Russian aircraft in Latin American drug smuggling, and they sent in their "Russian expert." It was this very same agent, who spoke no Russian or Spanish, and had no meaningful experience in the aviation smuggling field. A final note, related to the 9/11 hijackers listed in the previous paragraph. When the television news showed the counter-terrorism team examining the hijackers' residence after the tragedy, this individual was again shown, now as a counter-terrorism team member. How many unqualified jobs does this agency send their people out to?
- I sent an associate with a number of agents to a Caribbean location to meet with two law enforcement agents who wished to cooperate, but lived in a Latin American country where US law enforcement was compromised. When my source arrived, the agents brought in another US agent, but one who was stationed in that compromised country. Both of the people I introduced to US agents were murdered soon after they returned to their own country. Again, the arrogance of these agents, to arbitrarily change the rules, caused two deaths. To add insult to injury, the agency wouldn't pay the travel costs of my people. I had to go all the way to the ASAC (Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge, the number two ranked person in that office) to get the costs reimbursed. I did hear that one of the agents was later disciplined, but not for the unfortunate deaths of two good mean who only wanted to assist the United States.
- I brought in from a great distance a friend to get wired for sound and sting a prominent attorney who was involved with Russian organised crime. The agency gave him an outdated, bulky concealed microphone and transmitter that was so large that it had to be placed in a box, which my friend had to carry into the lawyer's office. the lawyer made the sting in a second. Why did they try to get by with inferior equipment?
These are but a couple of my personal nightmares. Whilst there are many successes that overshadow these flops, the agents involved, who were solely responsible for the failure, were generally not even reprimanded.
Next week: My work get even more interesting.
The facts and opinions stated in this article are those of the author and not those of World-Check. World-Check does not warrant the accuracy of any facts and opinions stated in this article, does not endorse them, and accepts no responsibility for them.
Read more in this exciting series



